Draft proposal sections in your own voice
Generic AI writing tools produce text that reads nothing like you. FunderIntelligence models your writing voice from your prior proposals and publications (Pro), so AI-drafted Specific Aims, Significance, and Approach sections sound like your lab — a starting draft you refine, not boilerplate you rewrite.
Critique against agency review criteria
Reviewers score to a rubric. FunderIntelligence runs agency-aware critique across six agencies — NIH, NSF, USDA, DoE, DoD, and NEH — flagging where a draft is weak on the criteria that specific program uses, so you fix gaps before submission rather than after rejection.
Turn rejection into a revision plan
Paste in a summary statement or reviewer comments and FunderIntelligence converts them into a prioritized revision brief — what to strengthen, what reviewers flagged, and how funded proposals in the same program handled it, drawn from past-award synthesis.
Frequently asked questions
Does the AI write my whole grant proposal for me?
No — it produces strong first drafts of individual sections that you review and refine. It is built to accelerate and strengthen your writing, with critique against agency criteria, not to submit unedited AI text.
Will the writing sound like me or like generic AI?
On the Pro plan, FunderIntelligence models your writing voice from your prior proposals and publications so drafts match your style. Voice personalization is what separates it from general-purpose AI writing tools.
Is my proposal data private?
Yes. Your documents, proposals, and profile are private to your account and are not used to train shared AI models. Only public funder-level intelligence is cached and shared.